Mandatory Waiver For Juvenile Gang Members In Tennessee

نویسندگان

  • Rebecca Sanders
  • Sarah Moore
چکیده

Each year the national percentage of juvenile gang members decreases, while the number of gang related crimes has risen in Tennessee. Nearly 50% of gang members are currently under the age of 18. Adjudication of juvenile gang related cases is determined by the presiding judge’s discretion, but with the passing of House Bill 227 and Senate Bill 339 the offender would be automatically transferred from juvenile to adult court. These bills, which are sponsored in the Tennessee General Assembly by Representative Sheila Butt and Senator Joseph Hensley respectively, state that if a juvenile was accused of a crime that is associated with gang activity (as listed in § 40-35-121) and has a prior offense, they must be transferred to adult criminal court. This analysis will evaluate the bills’ immediate and long-term impact on individuals and the community, the strengths and limitations of this legislation, and our recommendations for change. We will then evaluate the proposed bills in light of our professional values as social workers. We suggest that the mandatory waiver law for juveniles with prior gang related offenses is not in the best interest of juvenile offenders, especially those of color or low socioeconomic status. We understand that the possibility of being tried as an adult could serve as a deterrent for juveniles in the system, but argue that the poor outcomes of juveniles tried as adults outweighs any deterring aspect of the law. A law focused on the rehabilitation of juvenile gang offenders, rather than punishment, would better serve all key stakeholders involved.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Juvenile and Criminal Justice Systems' Responses to Youth Violence

Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived increases in serious, persistent, and violent youth crime. These changes diminish the jurisdiction of juvenile courts as judicial decisions and statutory changes transfer more youths from juvenile courts to criminal courts so that young offenders can be sentenced as adults. Amendments to juvenile s...

متن کامل

Waiver of Jurisdiction An Evaluation of the Process in the Juvenile Court DOUGLAS

A critical evaluation of the waiver process identifies certain inconsistencies between the goals and methods of the juvenile court movement and points out the difficulties resulting from procedures that attempt to reconcile the goals of punishment and rehabilitation. Several popular explanations for the use of the waiver process are examined and found insufficient to justify removing children f...

متن کامل

Commentary: Risk markers for incompetence in juvenile defendants.

The juvenile court was founded on a rehabilitation model in which competence of the juvenile defendant to undergo criminal process was not an issue. A few juveniles charged with serious crimes such as murder were waived to adult court, but maturity was generally taken into consideration in the waiver decision, and so severely mentally ill, mentally retarded, or very young defendants tended to r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015